The second chapter was a wonderful
summary of what is wrong with our current school set up and what changes need
to occur to make it better and move us into the 21st century of
education. One of the biggest hurdles to
moving forward is the old school thought brought by administration and the
community on how school has worked for decades before. There is not an understanding by these people
on why it is so important to integrate technology into the classroom and to
move away from the traditional rows of desk set up in a classroom. Slowly schools in the nation are changing
their layout – specialization academies are becoming more popular, large open
school buildings with less restrictive walls are becoming the norm,
non-traditional classroom locations are being tested, and technology is
becoming standard in all classrooms on a large scale. When the teachers, students, administrators,
and parents are all on the same page with these changes; then great things are
happening in these districts with test scores, graduation rates, and student
enjoyment in learning.
This chapter was something that I
deal with on a daily basis in designing schools. Each time we meet with the administration at
the beginning of the project, there is a decision that is made – what will this
school be like? So many times either the
head designer or the administration, or both will lay out the classrooms and
the schools like an old traditional school building with rows of classrooms on
a corridor with lockers, a media center down the hall, and some computers in
far off computer labs. Each time these
decisions are made, I sit back and wonder how a teacher in that environment can
make this new attempt at the traditional more collaborative and more 21st
century, especially when she is not being given anything to work with. Currently I am working with a Vo-Tech that
is pushing the limits of what they can do with a 21st century
learning environment and they are allowing me to help them design their school
this way. Teachers are using flexible
seating, smaller classrooms with break-out rooms around the perimeter,
Smartboards and projectors, group collaboration technology, and other great
ideas that will help the teachers and students really achieve something
different in their fields. One of the
driving points behind their design is looking at what is currently being used
in the fields that they are teaching, and they are trying to mimic that within
their classroom instead of just teaching about it. Students have iPads to use as their textbooks
and learning tools and libraries are slowly becoming smaller and more about
references then large volumes of material.
It is exciting to work in a school that is making this change and it
excites me for the day when I will have my own classroom and either work for a
school that is willing to make these changes or hopefully be integral in
helping a school make changes.
It takes an entire community to
make the changes to our schools. The
citizens need to vote on the bond issues for buildings and technology, the
administration needs to allow the change, the designers need to create a
flexible space, and the teachers need to adjust their teaching styles to
something new and exciting. All of these
together will help our students enjoy school more and achieve in a way we never
thought possible.
Katie,
ReplyDeleteNow that I understand your background better, I immediately thought.. She liked this chapter. I think one of the greatest problems that we face school design is that people are afraid to be innovative.. and they want to replicate what has been done before.. and schools that make errors are not rewarded for being out there.. For example open classroom concepts, if you visit Madison Elementary in Norman, they have created their own walls with file cabinets and bookshelves. So they really did not embrace the change.. THat is part of the issue with school design... often administrators are on board but have not paid attention to the buyin of the teachers or the people using the rooms... In this area, you might be well served to read a book called Diffusion of Innovations by Rogers.. in this book his lays out how to introduce an educational change.. it might be something that administrators are familiar with and it could help you get in buy in on projects..
btw.. we are looking at making an active classroom in the college and one of the things that I am frustrated with, is that we are trying to emulate other projects on campus and nationally. I would really like to see it include an Interwrite board and a Smartboard and maybe a promethean board so that we would be modeling the prevalent technologies in local schools.. but I worry the cool factor (ie.. digital versus analog) will win out.. because its difficult to leverage several analog technologies at once.. I do think a room that was similar to 3 school systems would rock..
The open classroom concept is very interesting. The elementary I went to in Mid-Del was an open classroom concept and we divided between grade levels or classes with coat cabinets and such also. I am not old enough to know what the original design intent was if they were suppose to just be a big open room or what. My 6th grade teachers actually paired up and did bigger learning areas wehre there were 2 classes merged. It would be interesting to do a study in a school like Madison and put teachers who were working on a collaborative/ 21st century style of teaching together and see how it worked before building a new school in that format.
DeleteGould hall put in a good deal of technology with their remodel. Most of which the students will not find in architecture firms when they graduate and get jobs. While having the most up to date stuff is really cool in college it doesn't always translate well to reality and what they will get in a job. Same with schools - how many schools out there still have chalk boards and overhead projectors!